Presentation & feedback 24/04
General Feedback:
-Make / buy something:
able to assemble?
right connection?
estethics
compare suppliers
-No lose components
-Support design process enough?
-overview of phases
-affordances: why didn't use see something?
change: color/ texture/ shape (semantics)
what action do you want to trigger?
difference: notice something (color); action (shape, texture)
difference: physical and cognitive problems
-priority on affordances: 1 trigger more than other trigger : change perseption
-physical trigger points
-flat sheet: not injection moulding
geometry (material / process)
-use of sandwich materials (lightweight)
-perceived value of materials
-quantify number of pieces
# plates
#hinges per plate
Feedback on our presentation:
-Make / buy something:
able to assemble?
right connection?
estethics
compare suppliers
-No lose components
-Support design process enough?
-overview of phases
-affordances: why didn't use see something?
change: color/ texture/ shape (semantics)
what action do you want to trigger?
difference: notice something (color); action (shape, texture)
difference: physical and cognitive problems
-priority on affordances: 1 trigger more than other trigger : change perseption
-physical trigger points
-flat sheet: not injection moulding
geometry (material / process)
-use of sandwich materials (lightweight)
-perceived value of materials
-quantify number of pieces
# plates
#hinges per plate
Feedback on our presentation:
- Phases & functions are related, multiple functions = good
- Indeed better if it's not fixed
- Think about how we sell the product
- with variations in thickness of folders
- how we would configure it
- Material selection
- what are the main criteria?
- Wheight of the whole thing
- stifness important everywhere?
- how many plates do you carry?
- Design process flexible => less overview => 'that's a choice'
Reacties
Een reactie posten